Se rolar abaixo assinado eu assino! na moral é muito foda AS!

essa porra num tem o q fazer e vai tirar nossa diversão das madrugas aff porra

vai tomar no cu qyem tirou! vai dar o cu ou procura uma mulé! fdp!

BOTA AS DE VOLTA SENÃO EU MANDO TIRAR O CN DO MEU PACOTE DE TV POR ASSINATURA!

beeijos

Viva!

No final, tudo se resume a “gosto é igual a cu. Cada um tem o seu e não enfia o dedo no dos outros”. Mas que ele tá parecendo o Predador sem máscara, ah, isso ele parece ^^

Um texto bem legal… Quem manjar de inglês, vale a pena!

IN MOD WE TRUST

The very question “why” is offensive. The suggestion that we are obligated to answer this question when they are not is by definition bigoted. One has the responsibility to answer the question why to oneself. Under no circumstances does anyone have the right to non-consensually question or investigate the personal motives.
On the subject of societal norms:
Fleeting changes in the whims of the lowest common denominator, grains of sand barely understood by the hundredth monkey that blindly follows, represent our collective “statistically normal” deaths. We declare those who adhere to norms for the sake of conformity to be traitors to everything that makes humanity beautiful. We, the people full of daring creativity and energy, declare them to be a scourge upon our planet. The entire concept of a “societal norm” as far as aesthetic definitions go is a flawed concept. It suggests that somehow there are blanket laws that apply to all of us. The very fact that these laws change radically from region to region and time to time points out their fallacies: are we expected to believe that humans are different in 2007 than they were in 1807? Or that humans are different in Britain than they are in India? Following these norms is an easy way out that surrenders much of what we should value in ourselves. Any free person knows that “societal norm” is just another term for “prison”.
On the subject of the unmodified:
We have no objection to people who do not choose to pursue their bodies per se. Body modifications and the rituals that surround them are unimportant when stripped of meaning, and there are many ways to explore freedom without the body’s specific involvement. We only object to those who choose to deny control over one’s body and the issues surrounding it, be it out of simple physical fear, or be it from a large fear of nonconformance. That said, there is much to be learned about oneself and ones place in the world be taking that brave step into active self ownership. The unmodified are no more unable to have vision than the blind. Even though the blind may not have functional eyes, they are very capable of vision on the greater scale. Any attempt to deny the right to pursue body modification should be seen as a direct attack on personal freedom and should not be tolerated under any circumstances.
On the subject of Freedom:
Freedom is what we are demanding. Freedom to pursue a way of life that enhances us, and we feel enhances the planet without bringing harm to anyone. We recognize everyone’s right to lead their life in any way they see fit as long as it does not encroach on our freedom to do the same. Any attempt to deny this freedom shall be seen as an act of war and will be responded to with the full retaliatory force deserved.
Source: BMEzine

cYa